Wednesday, January 26, 2011

 

Extra Credit

Read two critiques or responses to the President's State of the Union Address. How does this affirm or conflict with your conclusions?
Give the reviewers credentials and where their comments appeared.

Comments:
Chasity Babb
Professor Sabir
English 201 B
26 January 2011

According to the responses, i agreed alot with Kandace Chao and Deshawn Smith because both of them stated real good facts for both the school system and working alot on oakland to. It really didn't change my conclusion much because i said the same thing as well about fixing our school systems and working on oakland to.
 
Hi Chasity:

I moved your reponse to the freewrite section. I am speaking here of published commentaries, the type one finds in a newspaper or on a television or radio show.
 
Kimber Soriano
Professor Sabir
English 201A
5 Feb. 2011


I affirm what Sarah Palin saying is true because she criticizes that Obama's State of the Union Address states that Obama had lost the trust of the American people. “Real leadership is more than just words; it's deed,” which is the Alaskan governor said in the Face book. Palin considered the speech as if he was leaving his role to the big government for paying the education, infrastructure, and technology. She also against the president's action because the president did not pay a lot of attention to what the important issue is the federal debt. She added that the future of the country (U.S.) is at risk and we are at the point of the crisis that the government spending too much money, borrowing too much money, and growing too much debt. The debt is growing and millions of Americans are affected to look for job employment.
 
fuck obama
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?